Forgot your password? Create an account
  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size
  • default color
  • green color
  • red color

MabuhayRadio

Friday
May 25th
Home Sections Literature and Fourth Estate Firing of Philippine News' Editor Is Poetic Justice
Firing of Philippine News' Editor Is Poetic Justice PDF Print E-mail
User Rating: / 0
PoorBest 
Sections - Literature and Fourth Estate
Written by Bobby Reyes   
Sunday, 24 June 2007 03:19

The dismissal of Lito Gutierrez as editor-in-chief of the Philippines News (PN) is not "death of Fil-Am Press Freedom." It is just a case of Mr. Gutierrez' receiving his own dose of medicine. During the five-year tenure of Mr. Gutierrez as editor-in-chief, he refused to publish my letters of protests sent to the PN about the one-sided articles that presented only the black propaganda of its columnists, Mrs. Lourdes Ongkeko and Rodel Rodis, about the Ongkeko vs. Reyes libel case in the Superior Court of Los Angeles. The PN refused even to receive the BCCs of e-mails that I sent to the different Filipino-American publications about the libel case and Mr. Rodis-led financial scandals in the National Federation of Filipino-American Associations (NaFFAA). At one time, Mr. Gutierrez sent me an e-mail that "requested" that I delete from my mailing list all the PN screen names, including his own e-mail address.

The PN refused also to publish our commentaries about the NaFFAAgate scandals of San Jose and our demand to its columnist Rodis to publish the financial statements about the NaFFAA global Filipino networking conferences and San Jose annual convention that Rodis, et al, orchestrated. The PN refused to print any detail of the civil and criminal cases filed against Ben Menor, Rodis' cochair of the San Jose NaFFAA convention, where city funds were diverted from the Northside Community Center to the NaFFAA. The PN's censorship of the Ongkenkoygate, the NaFFAAgate, the Menorgate and the other scandals of the Rodis-led NaFFAA Gang of Crooks proved that the newspaper never followed the tenets of press freedom.

The PN news refused also to publish the press releases of the 2006 Kalayaan (Philippine Independence) Steering Committee, even those sent by its organizer, the Philippine Consulate General of Los Angeles. Why? Because I happened to be the elected overall Kalayaan chairman. The PN would not run any story that contained any reference to me or a photo that included my face.

And now, Mr. Gutierrez cries foul because "he refused to spike a story?" He has been doing it to me all the years he was working for the PN. What happened to Mr. Gutierrez is just the dramatization of "poetic justice."

Our media group has campaigned since 2002 against the PN. We asked and continue to ask people and advertisers to stop subscribing to, and advertising in, it. Now, it is being distributed for free in Southern CA. Why? Nobody now subscribes to it. And lately a former advertiser (a lawyer) said that he received a letter from the IRS where he was instructed that if he had any payable to the PN, that the payment be remitted instead to the IRS.

Just like the NaFFAA, the PN has lost its credibility. Unless it follows strictly the tenets of journalism and fair play, the PN will just be one of the many Fil-Am publications that have become irrelevant to the needs of Filipino Americans. Sooner or later, its publishers will realize that they cannot throw good money after bad and continue to lose money in publishing it. It is like pouring funds into a bottomless pit.

Press freedom? We do not think that its founder, present owners and editorial staff, including Mr. Gutierrez, really know what it means.

Readers may like to read the current brouhaha on the Internet about the firing of Mr. Gutierrez.

=====================

Global Filipinos3 <globalfilipinos3@gmail.com> wrote: THE DEATH OF FIL-AM PRESS FREEDOM. Philippine News, the oldest-and-largest (sic)Filipino-American newspaper fires Mr. Lito Gutierrez, its editor-in-chief. The letter of the newspaper President and the statement of the editor-in-chief are reprinted below in full.
==============================

From: " francis.espiritu@philippinenews.com" <francis.espiritu@philippinenews.com>
To: litogutierrez@yahoo.com; lito.gutierrez@philippinenews.com
Cc: carmen.espiritu@philippinenews.com; j.espiritu@sbcglobal.net
Sent: Saturday, June 23, 2007 5:18:46 PM
Subject: termination
June 23, 2007

Mr. Lito Gutierrez

Dear Mr. Gutierrez,

FedEx is trying to deliver your letter and checks but nobody would receive it.

You are hereby advised that your employment with Philippine News is terminated effective immediately.

Your final check, including any accrued vacation is attached with the FedEx package.

You are required to immediately surrender all corporate property in your possession including but not limited to the keys and ID.

You are no longer authorized to access any corporate information in any medium.

You are further advised that any malicious attempts to injure the corporation as a result of this termination will be met by vigorous legal action.

Very truly yours,

Francis Espiritu
President
=========================

STATEMENT OF MR. LITO GUTIERREZ:


PHILIPPINE NEWS has fired its editor in chief after he refused to spike a story as instructed by the paper's management.


Lito Gutierrez, 55, who has been with the oldest and the only nationally circulated Filipino American newspaper for five years, received a call June 22 from the paper's advertising manager who told him he had been terminated.


The story involved the case of Carlos Araneta, head of the San Francisco-based cargo and money remittance facility LBC, who had lost his appeal to have a court ruling against him reversed. He had been ordered to pay $25 million to his partners who accused him of depleting the assets of their partnership in a bank.


LBC is a major advertiser in Philippine News and other Filipino American media.


"The management of Philippine News must have forgotten that we are not in some banana republic, that we are in the United States of America where freedom of the press is a fundamental right," said Gutierrez.


"Can you imagine," he asked, "if it had been the White House or some powerful politician who called?" Gutierrez said this was not the first time he had been asked to kill a story. Last year, he said PN president Francis Espiritu asked him not to use any story on businessman Rene Medina who had been charged by the Internal Revenue Service of failing to pay taxes.


Medina is the owner of Lucky Chances, a gaming facility in Colma, Calif., which, like LBC, is major advertiser. He said he was able to avoid a confrontation with Espiritu and use the story on page one after Loida Nicolas Lewis, who then headed the National Federation of Filipino American Associations (NaFFAA), issued a statement in support of Medina, saying that the IRS case was politically motivated.


In an e-mail message to Gutierrez, the writer who had been assigned to do the Araneta story, Felix Ilagan said, Espiritu merely put a "hold" on the story so the paper's lawyers could go over the documents.


"I think the guy just wants to smoothen things over," Gutierrez said in response. "But that's just being disingenuous. Given the propensity of Philippine News's management to suck up to advertisers at the expense of serious, honest journalism, that 'hold' order was effectively a 'kill' order. Let's not kid ourselves here."


The public has this perception that media sing to the tune of advertisers, he continued. "Well, not under my watch." # # #



Related news items:
Newer news items:
Older news items:

Last Updated on Sunday, 24 June 2007 03:43
 

Add your comment

Your name:
Your email:
Subject:
Comment (you may use HTML tags here):
Banner

Quote of the Day

"I think that's how Chicago got started. A bunch of people in New York said, 'Gee, I'm enjoying the crime and the poverty, but it just isn't cold enough. Let's go west.' "--Richard Jeni

Pilipinas Tours